Delay the QPP Pension: Future Income and Break-Even
Compare the enhanced pension with the income forgone during the delay and locate the break-even for your situation.
In this article
Taking the QPP pension at 60, reduced, or deferring it to get a larger one: the question draws strong opinions and deserves a three-step calculation. First the amounts, taken from the plan's statement of participation rather than generic examples. That statement gives the estimated pension at each start age, based on your actual contributions. Then the break-even. Multiply the early pension by the months of head start to get what deferral gives up. Divide by the monthly gap to find the age where the enhanced pension catches up; the wider the gap in start ages, the later that point comes. Every month lived beyond adds to the advantage of deferring. Finally the context, because the break-even alone decides poorly: health and family longevity, tax (the pension stacks onto your other income), your real need for cash and the sources that would fund the wait. Document the decision and revisit it if your health changes. This article guides the full calculation and the factors to weigh to turn it into a personal decision.
Get the pension amount at each age
To decide whether to defer the public plan's retirement pension, start from your personal figures, not from general rules. The statement of participation gives the estimated pension at various start ages. That estimate depends on your contribution history, which is often incomplete because of years of study, unemployment or work abroad. Two people the same age get very different amounts. So do the calculation with your real figures, obtained from the plan, and not with increase percentages applied to a hypothetical amount.
Price the income you give up
Deferring the pension means receiving nothing during the deferral period. That forgone income is the cost of the operation. Deferring from 65 to 70, with an annual pension of $15,000, means giving up $75,000, in exchange for a larger pension for the rest of your life. To find the break-even point, divide the total given up by the annual supplement obtained. That gives the number of years of enhanced pension needed to catch up. In this example, that point lands in the early eighties.
Check the effect on other income and on tax
The gross break-even is not enough, because the pension is taxable and interacts with your other income. During the deferral, you have to live on something else, for example withdrawals from a registered plan. Those withdrawals are also taxable and reduce your capital. After the deferral, a larger pension can raise your taxable income enough to reduce income-tested benefits. To compare honestly, calculate net income after tax and benefits, year by year, in both scenarios. This exercise sometimes reverses the conclusion entirely.
Test longevity rather than guess it
Deferral is above all insurance against longevity. It pays more to those who live long and less to those who do not. The right question is therefore not to guess your date of death, but to identify which risk costs more. Running out of money at 90 is a serious problem. Leaving slightly less to the estate by dying early is a minor one for most households. That asymmetry explains why deferral often favours people in good health who have enough capital to wait.
Quebec scenario
At 60, a technician in Jonquière can claim her QPP pension now, reduced, or wait. Contradictory advice pours in, so she replaces opinions with a three-step calculation. First the amounts, which she checks in her statement of participation instead of estimating: about $780 a month at 60, $1,220 at 65, and more for each year of deferral beyond that, per the enhancements the plan confirms. Then the break-even point. Starting at 60 pays her five years of pension that waiting gives up, about $46,800. The enhanced pension at 65 closes that gap around age 74. Before that age, the early start comes out ahead. After it, the early start loses, and every month lived beyond adds to the advantage of deferring. Finally the context, because the break-even alone decides poorly. There is her health and her family's longevity, where the women live past 90. There is tax, since the pension stacks onto her other taxable income. And there is her actual situation: she still works part-time and has no immediate need. She chooses to defer to 65 and funds the gap from her RRIF, whose withdrawals also shrink the future minimums. Her decision fits on one dated page, with a review clause. Bad health news would reopen the file, since the break-even point does not know her life expectancy.
Checklist
- Pull the amounts from the statement of participation
- Price the pension at each contemplated age
- Calculate the break-even in months
- Weight it with health and family longevity
- Price the tax on the added pension
- Verify the real need for cash now
- Plan the financing of the wait
- Document the decision on one dated page
- Reopen the file if health changes
The questions we get
A question about your situation?
A Quebec broker answers, with no commitment.
Read next
// Investments
Convert an RRSP to a RRIF: Prepare Minimum Withdrawals
Note the conversion deadline and the minimum withdrawal factor that will apply from the following year.
// Investments
Life Annuity or Retirement Withdrawal Portfolio
An annuity guarantees income but locks up capital: measure what you give up in liquidity and estate value.
// Investments
TFSA or RRSP: Choose by Goal and Tax Rate
Choose between TFSA and RRSP based on the goal, the withdrawal horizon and your current and future tax rates.