Cashable or Non-Redeemable GIC: Choose Your Liquidity
Measure the extra rate offered in exchange for locking funds before giving up early redemption.
In this article
Choosing between a cashable and a non-redeemable GIC puts a price on exactly one thing: your commitment not to touch the funds. The rate gap, multiplied by the amount and duration, prices what the lock-up earns. The cashable version's redemption terms, often no interest in the first ninety days and then a contract-specific schedule, price what the flexibility really costs. The true variable is neither the rate nor the clause, it is the project's calendar. A firm date allows the non-redeemable at the better rate. A floating date calls for the cashable version, or better, a split between the two: the certain portion locked, and the portion exposed to surprises kept liquid. This article shows the gap calculation, how to read redemption grids and the allocation method that turns a calendar guess into simple dosing, adjustable at every maturity.
Read the redemption terms first
A GIC's cashable version sells flexibility, and that flexibility has precise contractual contours that you should read before buying. A typical grid allows redemption at any time, but pays no interest if it happens within the first ninety days. After that, the redemption rate is sometimes below the accrued rate, depending on the contract. Some versions impose minimum redemption amounts or precise windows. The real flexibility is therefore conditional: an early redemption can make the investment less profitable than an ordinary savings account. Reading the grid turns the word cashable, a sales argument, into known mechanics. You avoid the unpleasant surprise of a redemption paying less than expected at the precise moment the money was needed.
Price what the lock-up earns
The rate gap between non-redeemable and cashable is the price the market pays for your commitment. Convert it to dollars before deciding: the gap multiplied by the amount and the duration. One point on twenty thousand dollars for two years is worth four hundred dollars, a sum to compare against the real probability of needing the funds before maturity. Assess that probability honestly. An emergency fund already in place elsewhere shrinks the GIC's liquidity requirement to almost nothing and makes the lock-up nearly free. The absence of a cushion makes the flexibility precious. This calculation ties the GIC choice to the health of the rest of your finances, something comparing rates alone never does.
Assess the project date's firmness
The decisive variable is neither the rate nor the clause, it is the calendar of the project the money funds. With a firm date (a booked wedding, a tax balance, a known deadline), a non-redeemable GIC aligned to that date, at the better rate, makes sense: the wait will end on time. With a floating date (renovations depending on a contractor, a purchase depending on the market), be cautious. The project can demand the funds before maturity, and a non-redeemable GIC does not sell, it waits. Assess the date's firmness without indulgence, since optimistic calendars are the norm: a project that has never started on time in the past will not start today. The right GIC term matches the realistic scenario, not the hoped-for one.
Split rather than decide
When the date wavers, splitting beats betting. Put the need's certain portion in non-redeemable at the better rate, and the portion exposed to surprises in the cashable version or a savings account. A twenty-thousand-dollar renovation with a soft date structures itself accordingly: twelve thousand locked for the main work, whose start you control, and eight thousand liquid for the site's surprises. Adjust the split at every maturity, using the day's rates and the project's state, and document it: rates noted in the file let you judge the next renewal on the same criteria. The split turns a calendar guess into a reversible setting. The return sacrificed on the liquid portion becomes an owned choice rather than an accident.
Quebec scenario
A lecturer in Baie-Comeau wants to place $20,000 earmarked for renovations planned in roughly two years, with no firm date. The two-year non-redeemable GIC offers 4.6% and the cashable version, 3.4%. The 1.2-point gap is worth $240 a year: the price the market pays for her promise not to touch the funds. She reads the cashable version's redemption terms: refundable at any time, but no interest at all if redeemed within the first 90 days. Her real question is not the rate but the calendar: if the contractor frees up early, will she need the money before maturity? She splits the sum: $12,000 in the non-redeemable GIC for the bulk of the work, whose date she controls, and $8,000 in the cashable version for job-site surprises. She notes the decision with the day's rates attached, so the next maturity gets decided on the same criteria rather than on instinct. The yield she gives up on the cashable half thus becomes a documented choice.
Checklist
- Price the rate gap between the two versions
- Multiply by the amount and duration
- Read the cashable version's redemption grid
- Check the no-interest period on redemption
- Assess the project date's firmness honestly
- Lock the certain portion at the better rate
- Keep the uncertain portion cashable
- Note the day's rates in the file
- Repeat the interrogation at every maturity
The questions we get
A question about your situation?
A Quebec broker answers, with no commitment.
Read next
// Investments
FHSA: Plan Contributions Before a First Home Purchase
Confirm your first-home-buyer eligibility and contribution room before planning FHSA deposits.
// Investments
Build a GIC Ladder to Spread Maturities
Split the amount across several maturities so one tranche renews at a time and rate risk is smoothed.
// Investments
TFSA or RRSP: Choose by Goal and Tax Rate
Choose between TFSA and RRSP based on the goal, the withdrawal horizon and your current and future tax rates.